AT&T failed to repair Ohio man’s damaged Web service for a month

Ohio resident John Sopko needed to go a month with out his AT&T mounted wi-fi Web service as a result of the corporate repeatedly didn’t diagnose and repair the issue, the Akron Beacon Journal reported in the present day. AT&T lastly discovered this week that the antenna on Sopko’s roof was damaged and had to get replaced, however not till after a parade of assist calls and technician visits.

Sopko mentioned he is not an enormous Web consumer however that his girlfriend and her 17-year-old son are. The son has “been at his grandmother’s since 4 days after [the outage] began as a result of he wants it for varsity,” Sopko mentioned. Sopko’s home is both in or close to an space the place AT&T acquired US authorities funding to deploy service.

Sopko’s service stopped engaged on October 30. Rebooting the modem did nothing, so he referred to as AT&T’s service cellphone quantity and “adopted instructions to reboot the system.” That once more did nothing, so AT&T despatched a technician to his dwelling in Akron, however the tech simply repeated the steps that Sopko had already taken, in line with the report:

“He went and turned every part off and plugged it again in,” Sopko mentioned. Similar outcome—no connection.

AT&T despatched out a second technician, on Nov. 8. “He did the identical factor,” Sopko mentioned. “He mentioned it was an engineering drawback and was going to ship an e mail.”

Extra frustration, no rationalization from AT&T

Sopko did not hear again from AT&T, so he referred to as the corporate once more a few days after the second technician go to, the Beacon Journal article mentioned. “They mentioned they had been ‘troubleshooting’ and mentioned it could be again up in a few hours,” he advised the newspaper.

The service didn’t come again on-line inside a few hours, and Sopko mentioned he needed to “chase them down” once more as a result of AT&T did not name him again. He was ultimately in a position to schedule a technician appointment for November 23. However on that day, “he acquired one other textual content, confirming an appointment for Nov. 26. A textual content on Nov. 26 confirmed an appointment for two pm to 4 pm. Sopko mentioned he could not have responded in time to that textual content, so a brand new appointment was set for Dec. 3,” the newspaper reported.

The Beacon Journal report continued:

Sopko referred to as the service line once more on Nov. 26, speaking to a buyer consultant. “I do not wish to be imply to you,” he advised the consultant. “However this has been happening for 28 days now. Why?”

The consultant could not give a strong reply, which pissed off Sopko much more. “I am shopping for a product that I can not use,” he mentioned. “Inform me lightning hit a tower; inform me one thing.”

AT&T’s authorities funding

Lastly, Sopko was contacted on Tuesday of this week by an AT&T rep, and the corporate despatched what Sopko referred to as a “extra superior technician” to his home on Wednesday. The technician examined the antenna, discovered it wasn’t working, and changed it.

“That ‘antenna’ was a hard and fast wi-fi unit the corporate had put in a couple of yr and a half earlier than. The models are primarily utilized in rural areas the place cable strains aren’t in place,” the Beacon Journal famous.

Ohio is considered one of 18 states the place AT&T acquired $428 million from the Federal Communications Fee per yr for seven years beginning in 2015 to deploy 10Mbps Web utilizing mounted wi-fi expertise to 1.1 million properties and small companies. It is not clear whether or not Sopko’s house is counted in that deployment, however his handle on East Voris Road may be very near different Akron properties the place the FCC map exhibits backed deployment by AT&T.

AT&T nonetheless making an attempt to “decide what occurred”

Sopko “acquired a invoice on Tuesday for a month’s service he did not get” however later acquired invoice credit “and a present card for his troubles,” the Beacon Journal reported. AT&T advised the newspaper that “our technicians restored Mr. Sopko’s Web service and he’s glad.”

We requested AT&T for an evidence of why it took a month to diagnose and repair the issue. The corporate did not clarify however mentioned it’s trying into the matter.

“Clearly, this isn’t an appropriate buyer expertise and didn’t meet our expectations for the way we serve our prospects,” AT&T advised Ars in the present day. “We have now apologized to Mr. Sopko and credited his account. We’re reviewing this case to find out what occurred and to stop it from occurring once more.”

Source link